Manny Pizarro Professor CannonWriting Assignment#3 Essays - Crime

Manny Pizarro Professor CannonWriting Assignment#3 The movie 44 minutes to North Hollywood Shootout is about a robbery occurring at the bank of america of North Hollywood, California. The robbery was committed by two heavily armed men with AK-47s. The men were confronted by the california police department and began a fourth-four minute shootout between the two.The response by the california police department to this situation, I believe was pretty good. The police arrived on the scene extremely quickly. Also, the police department wasn't really properly prepared for a situation like this. In addition, the officers didn't even have the right weapons to fight these two guys with Aks. The police department did the best they could with what they had. If the officers were properly armed in that situation the shootout would've been over much quicker. If i was a police officer in that situation i would've stuck to what i was trained to do until we stopped the robbery and brought down the s uspects. Lastly, the gunmen were normal criminals that planned out a great compact robbery plan and were heavily prepared to fight. In that situation it was pretty disturbing to see the police so out gunned like that. Especially being in North Hollywood which is an area with a lot of people that could get hurt because of the police being out gunned. Even though it would be the police would be gunned out temporarily, it is still disturbing to see. The gunmen in the movie were extremely difficult to bring down. The gunmen had Ak-47s and body armor as well as having very structured plan intact. The type of investigation I would expect after this incident that they would found out who the gunmen were and background checks on them. In addition, I think they would investigate how they got the armor and guns used in the robbery. Lastly, the documentary/ film is true to life because it actually happened.

Free Essays on Causes Of The American Revolution

One cannot say there is one cause to the American Revolution because there were many contributing factors. Historians argue that the revolution was political and the colonists were just trying to preserve their rights. Another view is that the colonists were concerned with economic issues. Others argue that distance and Great Britain's â€Å"benign neglect† made revolution inevitable. All are correct but some played greater roles than others. The period known as â€Å"benign neglect† took place in the early 1700s before the thirteen colonies were prosperous. England neglected the colonies because it was in their best interest not to interfere. For example, a Roman Catholic man named Lord Baltimore founded Maryland in 1634. Townspeople soon established a proprietary system of self- government. This is just one example of what was achieved without the help of Great Britain. Similar advances happened throughout all the colonies. When New England along with the rest of the colonies began to prosper and set up more proprietary systems of self-government England began to take notice that the colonies could be used as a source of profit. â€Å"Benign neglect† was an important aspect of the revolution. Without having been left alone for many years America would have not have developed the taste of independence. Independence was what the American Revolution was all about. Many Navigation Acts had been passed starting in 1650 but none were enforced until Britain noticed they could cash in on the now prospering economic system of the colonies. Mercantilism played this role. The idea of mercantilism was to achieve economic self-sufficiency by exporting more than importing. England viewed the colonies as an easy way to do just that. For example, the colonies were forbidden to produce for export woolen cloth and beaver hats, because the colonies were supposed to â€Å"compliment and not compete with British industry.† Later in 1660 Charles II appr... Free Essays on Causes Of The American Revolution Free Essays on Causes Of The American Revolution Causes of the Revolutionary War During the late seventeen hundreds, many tumultuous events resulted in colonial opposition to Great Britain. The conditions of rights of the colonists will slowly be changed as the constriction of the parliament becomes more and more intolerable. During the seven years war England was not only alarmed by the colonists insistence on trading with the enemy, but also with Boston merchants hiring James Otis in order to protest the legality of the writs of assistance used to hunt out smuggled goods. â€Å"Let the parliament lay what burthens they please on us, we must, it is our duty to submit and patiently bear them, till they will be pleased to relieve us†. This is a very strong dictum, that in 1764, the colonists were of a submissive nature, and were weakly pleading for self-autonomy. This small fire of anger will become a huge conflagration as the rights are slowly rescinded. On October of 1765 the Stamp Act Congress and Parliamentary Taxation committees’s passed some laws that attempted to strengthen the grip of the English crown. That his Majesty’s subjects in these colonies, owe the same allegiance to the crown of Great Britain. This statement can be used as a summation of the entire document that the Stamp Act Congress had initiated. The statement depicts the colonists has having to be submissive and servile in the view of Great Britain, this policy angered the colonists very much, and was another component of the transition of the colonists rights and liberties. When the Declatory Act was passed in March of 1766, many colonies were attempting to claim that they were seceding from England. Where as several of the house of representatives in his majesty’s colonies and plantations in America, have of late, against law, or to the general assemblies of the same, th... Free Essays on Causes Of The American Revolution One cannot say there is one cause to the American Revolution because there were many contributing factors. Historians argue that the revolution was political and the colonists were just trying to preserve their rights. Another view is that the colonists were concerned with economic issues. Others argue that distance and Great Britain's â€Å"benign neglect† made revolution inevitable. All are correct but some played greater roles than others. The period known as â€Å"benign neglect† took place in the early 1700s before the thirteen colonies were prosperous. England neglected the colonies because it was in their best interest not to interfere. For example, a Roman Catholic man named Lord Baltimore founded Maryland in 1634. Townspeople soon established a proprietary system of self- government. This is just one example of what was achieved without the help of Great Britain. Similar advances happened throughout all the colonies. When New England along with the rest of the colonies began to prosper and set up more proprietary systems of self-government England began to take notice that the colonies could be used as a source of profit. â€Å"Benign neglect† was an important aspect of the revolution. Without having been left alone for many years America would have not have developed the taste of independence. Independence was what the American Revolution was all about. Many Navigation Acts had been passed starting in 1650 but none were enforced until Britain noticed they could cash in on the now prospering economic system of the colonies. Mercantilism played this role. The idea of mercantilism was to achieve economic self-sufficiency by exporting more than importing. England viewed the colonies as an easy way to do just that. For example, the colonies were forbidden to produce for export woolen cloth and beaver hats, because the colonies were supposed to â€Å"compliment and not compete with British industry.† Later in 1660 Charles II appr...

CRITICAL CLAIM MAJOR PAPER Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

CRITICAL CLAIM MAJOR PAPER - Essay Example This paper argues that the ad wants to suggest that Chanel, as a brand, is a seductive and sophisticated brand because of its sexual and affluence themes, although it is criticized for suggesting that women are men’s sexual objects. This Chanel advertisement suggests that women can only attain power, if they fully submit to the sexual desires of men. The entire scene of the ad is oriental in look, which uses the theme of Orientalism, where the Oriental is the â€Å"Other† that the dominant party uses for their own personal interests. Orientalism includes Asian and Middle Eastern signs and colors. The golden bed, golden bed sheets, and golden wall paper with its Middle-Eastern-looking designs signify Orientalism. They look exotic and different than usual Western designs. Orientalism is about power over what is different. Chanel wants to say that with an Oriental look, it is the one in power. The woman in bondage signifies power even more. She is the â€Å"product† that shows that Chanel is a powerful brand. It holds people, as if they are held captive. At the same time, the Oriental look shows sophistication. It suggests mastery over something; in this case, it is mastery over the weaker sex, the woman. Chanel might not be meaning to make it look like it is demeaning women or â€Å"Orientals,† but the entire picture looks like it is using the woman for its personal purposes, so that it can have power, the kind of power that is based on people’s weaknesses. The woman then cannot have power of her own, unless she becomes an Oriental entity. Furthermore, bondage is a sexual symbol, and Orientalism sexualizes the â€Å"Other† too. Chanel might just be saying that it is a powerful and sophisticated brand through the use of an Oriental woman. On the contrary, the use of a woman indicates sexual oppression. Even if the woman is white, her surroundings Orientalize her, thereby making her the â€Å"lower† person. Orientali sm, as an underlying theme, indicates the pervading sexual oppression of women in this advertisement. The entire dress and footwear signify Oriental beauty, specifically a trampled and used beauty. The skirt has beads and golden designs. It is the most Oriental-looking in the whole ensemble. The shoes and blouse are modern in design. The shoes have high heels, with the heels upside down. The down part is the woman, who cannot escape her bondage. The blouse is checkered with frill ends. The model wears a headband that matches her blouse. Her handcuff is her bag. The blouse, bag, and headband indicate that they reinforce each other. In other words, they strengthen the proverbial chains around the woman. Though the model has a modern fashion style, the entire effect is Orientalism because of the Muslim-inspired background. By looking as an Oriental, she becomes a maiden in distress, not a white modern woman in power. She is weak, so she is easily trapped, and she must be saved. Chanel saves her with its fashion sense. But why must she be imprisoned in the first place? The act of imprisonment suggests that she has no power to begin with. As an Oriental, she is a prisoner of the one in power. The power play is clear in the uneven relationship between the brand and the woman. Chanel is the authoritative brand, when it comes to sophisticated and modern tastes. It imprisons women with its